|
JOB MARKET ADVICE FOR MY STUDENTS
University of New Orleans
Finance 1330
Economics 1203
Economics 1203
Internet
Economics 1204
Finance 2302
Finance 3300
Tulane University
Finance 254
Finance 331
Finance 354
Time Value of Money
Mutual Funds
Bond Notes
Federal Reserve
Averages & Indexes
Securities Business
& Brokerage Firms
Economic Analysis, Industry
Analysis, Company Analysis
Stocks
Stock Valuation
Options
Stock Market News
How to set personal and professional
goals.
| |
This is an article from the February 20, 2006 Business Week Magazine on using
options to reduce portfolio risk. I thought it was an interesting read to
anyone that is interested in options.
FEBRUARY 20, 2006

Putting A Collar On Investment Risk
Options-based strategies can keep stock losses from getting out of line
Plenty of
stock market shocks have underscored the need to protect your portfolio.
Consider Google's (GOOG
) 7% drop on Feb. 1 or General Motors' (GM
) bankruptcy scare, which cut the price in half in recent months. Such losses
can be hard to make up, especially if you're close to retirement. "You wouldn't
think of not insuring your home," says Thomas J. Schwab, a founder of the
investment firm Summit Portfolio Advisors. "But no one thinks about insurance
when it comes to their investments."
Schwab (no relation to Charles) considers such insurance critical. With
investors stung by the bear market of just a few years ago, Schwab, then a
financial adviser at Smith Barney (C
) on the Hawaiian island of Maui, figured clients needed more protection against
crushing losses. Looking at a myriad of strategies, he zoomed in on an
options-based trade called a "collar" that uses a combination of puts and calls
to keep losses and gains on a stock within a specific range.
Schwab's collar strategy is at the center of the advisory firm, which opened in
September of last year and now has $7.5 million in assets under management. In
fact, it has turned the typical portfolio management process upside down.
Instead of choosing stocks first and then perhaps seeking options to protect
them, he only chooses stocks on which he can place a low-cost collar that gives
him at least twice as much potential gain as loss.
LIMITED
POTENTIAL
Of course, investors could always protect against price declines in a stock by
buying a put option alone and keeping the potential gains. That gives them the
right but not the obligation to sell a stock at a particular price. But put
options that will kick in near the current stock price are generally expensive.
That's why managers like Schwab sell call options -- the obligation, in this
case, to relinquish the stock at a preset price -- to offset the cost of the
put. Done right, the total collar should cost less than $1.00 per share (before
commissions), and can even net a credit.
The beauty of a collar is that you know, from the outset, the potential losses
and gains on a trade. In a runaway bull market, your returns are likely to be
somewhat muted because in selling a call, you've given up the right to
appreciation beyond a certain price. But on the flip side, you'll have the
comfort of knowing you're protected if the stock heads south. "We're a fan of
collars for large portfolios, especially retirement accounts," says Kevin Lund,
a strategist with Optionetics, a firm that gives options courses. "There is just
no reason to incur much risk just for a potential gain."
Take Google, which was trading around 379 after lackluster earnings smacked the
stock. Schwab recommends buying a 370 put that expires in January, 2008, which
costs around $63.10 per share. Next, sell a 470 call with the same expiration
date, collecting $64 per share. In all, that collar nets 90 cents a share. If
the stock closes above 470, the gain on the investment will be 24.4% over the
next two years, but the total loss would be only 2.1% should the stock drop
below 370. "This is a stock that would scare me to death if I owned it
outright," says Schwab. "With a collar, I can lower the risk."
Of course, commissions count. Even though costs have come down dramatically in
recent years, trading options still tends to be pricier than buying a stock.
Executing a collar strategy on 100 shares of Google, say, would cost $44.85 at
the discount brokerage OptionsXpress (OXPS
), vs. $14.95 for just buying the stock. This strategy generally makes sense
from a cost perspective if commissions lower your potential returns by no more
than one percentage point.
For his clients, Schwab typically collars 8 to 15 large-company stocks, covering
each major sector of the economy. He sticks with names that have options with an
expiration date one to two years out, since he prefers to be a buy-and-hold
investor rather than a trader. Potential collars can be found on his Web site (protectyourstock.com)
and include scores of blue-chip companies like Apple Computer (AAPL
), General Electric (GE
), and Procter & Gamble (PG
). It's the same way he invests much of his own money.
Schwab got into the investing business by chance. As an undergrad at Notre Dame
in the late '60s, Schwab interviewed with the New York Stock Exchange only as a
favor to a professor. After spending a few years at the exchange auditing
brokerage firms, he moved to Goldman Sachs (GS
) and later Smith Barney (C
) as a financial and pension consultant. Today investing is a family affair,
with both his daughter, Liz, and his son, Joe, running the firm with him. "I
wish I had been smart enough to use this strategy years ago," says Schwab.
Investors can be smarter today.
| |
|